The 90-Second Version: What They Can Take, What They Can’t, What To Pull Up Tonight
Here’s the thing nobody tells you when you’re panicking at midnight: they probably can’t take your house. If you’re in Florida or Texas and own your primary residence, the homestead exemption is so strong that a judgment creditor, including an MCA funder, cannot force a sale regardless of the judgment amount. Your employer-sponsored 401(k) is almost certainly protected by federal law no matter which state you’re in. OnDeck, Kapitus, Rapid Finance, Everest Business Funding — whoever left the voicemail using words like “breach” and “confession of judgment” — knows both of those things. They are counting on you not knowing them. [ref:audience_profiler]
Before you read anything else, three things.
Your house and your 401(k) are almost certainly safe. Exceptions exist, they’re real, and they turn on your state and on whether you signed a personal guaranty. More on those further down. The framing most MCA-relief blogs push at you, that the funder takes everything, isn’t what the actual enforcement record shows. [ref:content_strategist]
What the funder can do right now, without a court, is narrow. Three tools. Enforce a UCC-1 lien on business assets. Keep pulling ACH debits until the account empties. Send a letter to your biggest customer telling them to pay the funder directly instead of paying you. That’s the whole pre-judgment menu. Everything scarier requires a judgment, and a judgment is 30 to 180 days out, not Monday.
Pull up your MCA agreement tonight. Find the personal guaranty, the forum selection clause, the confession of judgment clause if there is one, and the reconciliation provision. Those four paragraphs decide most of what happens next. [ref:brief_interpreter]
The rest of this piece walks the contract, the clock, and what the funder can actually reach at each stage. Start with the word that is and isn’t in your agreement.
Why “Default” Is The Wrong Word
Pull your MCA agreement and search for the word “default.” You probably won’t find it. What you’ll find instead is “breach,” “event of non-performance,” or “reconciliation failure” [ref:brief_interpreter]. That isn’t drafting pedantry. It’s the spine of the whole deal.
An MCA is legally styled as a purchase of your future receivables, not a loan. The funder didn’t lend you $50k at an interest rate. On paper, it bought, say, $70k of your future sales at a discount and pulls a fixed slice each business day until it gets its money back. No usury cap applies, because “it’s not a loan.” That framing is why the funder has the remedies it has at all. The daily ACH authority. The blanket lien on your receivables. The right to send a §9-406 letter to your biggest customer. Every one of those flows from the “I bought your sales” story [ref:research_digest_writer].
The fiction has started cracking. In Crystal Springs Capital v. Big Thicket Coin, a 2024 New York appellate decision, the court applied a three-factor test. Is there a reconciliation provision. Is there a finite repayment term. Is there recourse if the merchant files bankruptcy. When the daily pulls are fixed amounts that ignore actual revenue, courts have started calling the contracts usurious loans, and New York’s criminal usury cap starts to apply [ref:quote_curator].
Here’s the part most borrowers miss. If your contract has a reconciliation clause, meaning the funder agreed to lower the daily pull when revenue drops, and you asked them in writing to reconcile and they ignored you, that is a real defense. Not hypothetical. Pull the clause tonight and find those emails.
The $10,000 advance against $19,900 due in 10 days that the NY AG pulled from Richmond Capital’s file works out to roughly 4,000% APR [ref:quote_curator]. At those numbers the “purchase of receivables” story stops being accounting. It’s a costume. And every tool the funder reaches for next week, the ACH pulls, the UCC-1, the letter to your biggest customer, exists because that costume still fits just well enough to hold up in most courts on a Monday morning.
What They Can Do Right Now, Without A Court
Strip the costume off and look at the actual pre-judgment menu. Before anyone files a lawsuit, before any judge sees your name, the funder has three tools they can use starting Monday morning. That’s it. Three. The sheriff is not on your porch. Your personal checking account is not frozen. What is actually in play pre-judgment is narrower than the 3 a.m. panic suggests, and worth understanding on its own terms.
The UCC-1 blanket lien on your business
When you signed the MCA, the funder filed a UCC-1 financing statement with your state. That filing almost certainly lists “all assets of the business” as collateral [ref:web_researcher]. In practice that covers:
- Business inventory
- Business equipment (yes, the paid-off delivery truck)
- Accounts receivable
- Business bank accounts
- General intangibles like trademarks, customer lists, software licenses
Pre-judgment the funder cannot just show up and haul the equipment away. Article 9 requires notice of default, a cure window, and commercially reasonable disposition [ref:research_digest_writer]. But the filing is live the day you signed, and it’s the quiet scaffolding under everything else they do. Section 7 has the actual how-to on pulling your own filings; for now, know that if you stacked advances from, say, Kapitus and Everest, you have two competing lienholders. That inter-creditor friction is sometimes real leverage for you.
ACH sweeps are the daily pain
The fixed daily debit is the mechanism you’re already living. You authorized it at origination, and the funder pulls a set amount every business day regardless of whether you had revenue. The Yellowstone NY AG settlement from section 2 documented exactly this pattern: “flexible, revenue-based payments” in the marketing, fixed amounts pulled in reality [ref:quote_curator]. One named victim, City Bakery in Manhattan, was paying more than $2,000 per day at peak before it closed after nearly 30 years [ref:web_researcher].
Calling your bank to kill the ACH is not a clean fix. The funder will re-attempt under a different SEC code, and some funders have argued that blocking the pulls is itself a contract breach. The question every reader has is whether to quietly open a new bank account the funder doesn’t know about. I will be honest with you: operators do it, and this is not legal advice. Moving funds specifically to dodge a known creditor is fraudulent-transfer exposure [ref:audience_profiler]. Talk to an attorney in your state before you touch it.
The receivables notice under UCC §9-406 is the sleeper
This is the one almost nobody sees coming. Under UCC §9-406, the funder can send an authenticated notice directly to your biggest customer telling them to pay the funder instead of you [ref:quote_curator]. Once your customer receives that notice, they are only discharged from their payment obligation by paying the MCA company. No court. No judgment. Pre-litigation.
It can kill your cash flow in a week.
The notice has to be authenticated and has to reasonably identify the rights assigned. A sloppy letter can be ignored, and the customer can request proof of assignment before redirecting a dime. But you won’t know a letter went out unless the customer calls you or you see it yourself. Ask whoever runs your AR to flag anything that arrives from the funder’s name, and tell your top three customers to call you before they change how they pay.
That’s the full pre-judgment toolkit. UCC-1 sitting over the business. ACH debits hitting every morning. A §9-406 letter that can show up at your biggest account. Nothing here touches your house, your 401(k), or your personal bank account. Not yet. The thing that changes that is a piece of paper you signed at origination and probably don’t remember.
The Personal Guaranty: Where Business Trouble Becomes Personal Trouble
“Not yet” is the hinge. The thing that turns the pre-judgment toolkit into something that reaches you, personally, is a piece of paper most borrowers signed without reading.
Somewhere in the application packet for that $85k wire, there was a personal guaranty. One or two paragraphs, usually on a page labeled “Exhibit B” or “Guaranty of Performance.” It says that if the business fails to pay, you personally promise to. Your spouse may have signed one too. Kapitus, OnDeck, Everest Business Funding, Rapid Finance all use PGs as standard paperwork. [ref:audience_profiler]
Look, by itself the PG does nothing. It is a promise sitting in a file drawer in someone’s New Jersey office. It does not give the funder the right to touch your checking account or drop a lien on your house. Inert, on its own.
What it is, is a bridge. Once the funder gets a judgment (the next section walks through how), the PG flips the posture from “we can chase the LLC’s empty account” into “we can chase you.” The corporate veil you thought was doing work is gone, because you personally promised to pay. The specific tools the funder gains from a judgment (bank levy, personal real-property lien, the rest) belong to the next section. The point here is narrower: none of them reach you without this one document.
The clearest public record of PGs being worked hard is the FTC’s case against RCG Advances. The FTC found the company advertised “no personal guaranty required” and then required them anyway, and used the signed guaranties together with confessions of judgment to reach borrowers’ personal assets [ref:research_digest_writer]. That was the documented business model. In February 2024 the FTC obtained a $20.3 million judgment against operator Jonathan Braun, who had already been permanently banned from the industry alongside co-defendant Vito Giardina under an earlier FTC order [ref:web_researcher].
Three variables decide whether your PG actually costs you anything: whether the funder chases a judgment, how long that takes, and what your state’s exemption law says about what they can reach once they have one. The next two sections walk through all three.
Getting A Judgment: What Changes, And When
So how does the funder actually get through the door the last section described. They sue. Either a regular lawsuit you get served with and can answer, or a confession of judgment you pre-signed at origination and forgot about. There isn’t a third path.
Section 4 already covered what a judgment does on the personal side: bank levy, real-property lien, wage garnishment in the states that allow it for commercial debt. One more tool worth knowing about that sits alongside those. Once the judgment is entered, the funder can serve you with an information subpoena and drag you in for sworn testimony about what you own and where it lives, which vehicles are titled in your name, which accounts hold what, and who else appears on your brokerage statements [ref:research_digest_writer]. The UCC-1 that was sitting quietly pre-judgment also converts into a sheriff’s levy they can actually execute against business assets [ref:web_researcher].
Now the number that matters more than any of that. Enforcement is 30 to 180 days from the day the funder files, not Monday [ref:brief_interpreter]. Service of process, answer deadlines, motion practice, and the courthouse queue all take weeks. You have time to pull documents, call a small-business attorney in your state, and make choices. The panic is real. The 72-hour countdown usually isn’t.
One thing to check right now. Most MCA contracts contain a New York or New Jersey forum selection clause regardless of where your business sits [ref:research_digest_writer]. You can be sued 2,000 miles from home. A lot of default judgments come from borrowers who never saw the summons because it went to an old address or a registered-agent service they forgot about. Check your mail. Check the court record in the funder’s home county.
Confessions of judgment
A confession of judgment is a document you likely signed at origination where you agreed, in advance, not to contest any future lawsuit. The funder files it with the clerk, the clerk enters judgment, no trial, no notice. In 2019 New York signed S6395, amending CPLR §3218, so confessions executed after August 30, 2019 by debtors residing outside New York are not enforceable in NY courts [ref:quote_curator]. Read that sentence twice. If you or your business sit inside New York, you are not covered by the amendment [ref:theme_analyst]. Virginia HB 1027 is a disclosure statute, not a COJ ban. Do not treat it as one [ref:research_digest_writer].
On the defensive side, NY CPLR §5015(a) lets a court vacate a default judgment in the interests of substantial justice when the underlying transaction was potentially criminally usurious, and the Crystal Springs Capital case pattern is the argument several borrowers have used [ref:quote_curator]. Not a guaranteed escape hatch. A real argument a local attorney can make.
The mechanism is not theoretical. NY AG Letitia James won a $77.3 million judgment against Richmond on February 8, 2024, and the AG’s finding was that Richmond filed confessions backed by false affidavits to seize assets from borrowers nationwide [ref:quote_curator]. Worth remembering the next time a collector’s voicemail says the paperwork is already filed. Sometimes it is. Sometimes the paperwork is what gets the funder sued instead.
What They Probably Can’t Touch (And The Caveats That Actually Matter)
When the judgment does land — whether through a lawsuit or a pre-signed confession — it still doesn’t reach everything you own. The exemption law you only ever heard about in bankruptcy chapters does real work here. Your 401(k), most of your IRA, your home in some states, and your Social Security check live in categories a judgment creditor has a hard time reaching even with a personal guaranty and a signed order. The relief is genuine. The caveats that go with it are also genuine, and a piece that skips them is just another kind of bad information.
Your 401(k) is almost certainly safe. ERISA §206(d)(1) (codified at 29 U.S.C. §1056(d)(1)) says the plan administrator cannot release ERISA-qualified plan assets to a judgment creditor. Anti-alienation, federal, not optional for the plan. Plain-English walkthrough at Nolo on retirement accounts and judgment creditors. The caveat that bites solo operators: a one-participant plan (you, or you plus a spouse, no non-spouse employees) may fall outside ERISA’s anti-alienation protection. Sole proprietors and single-member LLCs running a solo 401(k) do not get the automatic federal shield. State law fills the gap, and you want a local attorney to look at it before you assume anything. Background at IRA Financial on solo 401(k) creditor protection. [ref:research_digest_writer]
IRAs are not ERISA. Federal protection in bankruptcy runs up to $1,512,350 per person under BAPCPA, adjusted periodically. Outside bankruptcy, your state statute decides whether a creditor can levy an IRA, and the answers vary wildly. Florida and Texas are strong. New York is weaker. Check your state. [ref:research_digest_writer]
Homestead is not one rule. Florida protects unlimited equity under Article X §4 of the state constitution, capped at half an acre municipal or 160 acres unincorporated. Texas is also unlimited under Art. XVI §§50 and 51 with acreage caps. New York is around $170,825 under CPLR §5206(a), adjusting every three years, so verify the current figure before you rely on it. California runs $300k to $600k under CCP §704.730 depending on county median home price. Anywhere else, check Asset Protection Planners’ state-by-state homestead summary. [ref:web_researcher]
Social Security and federal disability are broadly shielded from garnishment for commercial debt under 42 U.S.C. §407. If an MCA collector tries to levy a Social Security deposit, the receiving bank has obligations under Treasury rules to protect the traceable funds. If you’re over 62 and your MCA debt is eating your retirement check, flag this to any attorney you speak with.
Now the caveats that actually sink people. Commingling personal and business money through one account erodes most of the above, because once a court can’t tell which dollars are yours personally and which are the LLC’s, your exemption arguments get a lot harder. Homestead has to have been established before the debt arose in most states; moving cash into home equity after you knew the MCA was in trouble has real fraudulent-transfer exposure. Texas is a community property state, which means a judgment on business debt can in some circumstances reach community assets and your spouse’s income, so the protections you read about for single filers are not quite the protections you have. [ref:audience_profiler] [ref:theme_analyst]
One more thing worth saying out loud, because a reader who skips it can end up surprised. Some MCA borrowers did inflate revenue or falsify bank statements to get approved. When that happened, the funder has a real case, the shields above narrow, and settlement posture changes. The big enforcement actions you keep reading about went after documented abuses on the funder side, not the existence of the industry. [ref:theme_analyst]
So: pull the facts that apply to you. Pull the caveats with them. The last thing in this piece is a short list of what to actually do with all of it tonight.
Your Checklist For Tonight
Five things to do in the next 24 to 72 hours. None of them moves money. All of them move information, because information is where your leverage lives on a 30 to 180 day timeline [ref:brief_interpreter].
- Pull your MCA agreement. Flag the personal guaranty, the forum selection clause, the confession of judgment clause if one exists and the reconciliation provision. If you asked for reconciliation in writing and got ignored, put those emails in their own folder.
- Look up your UCC-1 filings. New York operators, the NY DOS UCC search. Everyone else, Google “[your state] Secretary of State UCC search.” Print every hit. Note the secured parties and the collateral description.
- Export 90 days of bank statements. Circle every ACH debit from the funder and every failed pull. Dates, amounts, any NSF fees. That is your timeline.
- Stop commingling tonight. Personal in, personal out on one account. Business in, business out on the other. That one habit is what keeps the 401(k), IRA, and homestead shields from the last section actually intact [ref:audience_profiler].
- Book a one-hour paid consult with a small-business attorney in your state. Not an MCA-relief settlement company. Bring the contract, the UCC filings, and the bank statements.
The regulatory record running through this piece points one way: the “purchase of receivables” framing is getting stripped away in court faster than the industry expected. Crystal Springs, Richmond Capital, Yellowstone: every one of those cases turned on the same documented fact that fixed daily pulls with no relationship to actual revenue are not what the contracts say they are. If your funder ignored a written reconciliation request, that single paper trail is the same predicate those cases relied on. That’s not a settlement tactic. That’s a defense, and courts in 2024 and 2025 have been listening to it.
The 30-to-180-day window before enforcement lands isn’t a countdown. It’s working time. Build the record: pull the reconciliation requests, find the ignored emails, document what your revenue actually was versus what the funder pulled each morning. That file, handed to a small-business attorney in your state who has seen MCA cases, is how the operators who came out the other side of this got there.
This is not legal advice. Talk to a lawyer licensed in your state.
Need Legal Help?
Schedule a free consultation with our experienced NYC divorce attorneys.